PulteGroup Inc (PHM) — Q3 2024 Earnings Call Transcript

Thanks, Jim. I appreciate everyone joining our call this morning as we discuss another quarter of strong operating and financial results for PulteGroup. As detailed in this morning's press release, driven primarily by a 12% increase in closings, we reported a 16% year-over-year increase in third quarter earnings to $3.35 per share. Inclusive of our strong Q3 financial performance, for the first three quarters of 2024 PulteGroup has realized double-digit increases in closings, home sale revenues, and pretax income along with a 22% increase in reported earnings to $10.28 per share. In addition to delivering significant growth in revenues and earnings for the trailing 12-month period, PulteGroup realized a return on equity of 27%, while continuing to drive strong cash flow and lowering our debt to capital ratio to 12%. Our strong financial performance also allowed us to continue returning funds to shareholders. Through the first nine months of 2024, we returned $1 billion to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends. This is an increase of $200 million or 25% from last year in terms of funds allocated back to our investors. I think these numbers are all the more impressive given the fluctuating backdrop that we've all been working through. Over the course of the year, we've seen the 30-year mortgage rates climb from 6.75% in January, 7.5% in April, only to fall back to 6% in September. And then, of course, a recent climb in interest rates back to 6.75% has the 30-year mortgage rate back to where we started 2024. We track consumer sentiment among visitors to our website and our communities, and as you might expect, buyer confidence ebbs and flows with meaningful changes, or even just volatility and interest rates. This again proved to be the case as buyers reacted to the movement in rates during the third quarter. With mortgage rates hovering around 6.5% to begin the third quarter, buyers were generally less inclined to sign a purchase agreement. As interest rates declined through August and September, however, we experienced a noticeable pickup in overall activity. In fact, of the three months in the quarter, we generated the highest net new orders and absorption paces in the month of September. Driven by September's strong performance, the Q3 absorption pace of 2.4 orders per community per month was certainly above the typical pre-COVID numbers for the third quarter. The recent October has shown the highest web traffic, foot traffic, and lead volume of the year. However, the recent rise in interest rates has demonstrated a more typical seasonal selling pattern and incentives have remained elevated as a consequence. Between rate volatility, the impact of hurricanes, and the upcoming presidential election, I think the upcoming spring selling season will offer the best assessment of fundamental housing demand. I think buyer reaction to the movement rates, both down and now up, again affirms that affordability remains a tough hurdle to get over for many potential home buyers. The most recent S&P Case-Shiller Index shows home prices continue to hit all-time new highs, although the rate of appreciation has slowed, which in combination with expected lower mortgage rates could offer some relief to consumers going forward. As has been discussed extensively over the past few years, one of the pressure points that continue to push home prices higher is the fact that after years of underbuilding, this country has a housing deficit estimated at several million homes. The Mortgage Bankers Association issued a useful graphic a few weeks ago that is shown on Slide 15 in today's webcast slides. The graph shows housing stock added by decades since the 1940s. Looking at the graph, you can clearly see the significant drop in production during the past 15 years. To make this point even clearer, we modified the MBA graph by overlaying the growth in U.S. population over the decades. What you see is that just since the 1960s, our country's population has almost doubled to just shy of 350 million people, while housing production has been flat to down over the decades. Given the high cost of homeownership, rate buy-downs remain a powerful incentive in helping consumers bridge the affordability gap. In the third quarter, approximately 30% of our home buyers accessed our national rate program. To take advantage of our national rate incentive, home buyers will typically need to close within 30 to 60 days of signing the contract. So it's important that we continue to have an inventory of homes in production. At the end of the third quarter, 43% of the homes in production were specs, so we are well positioned to meet demand as we close out 2024. Along with benefiting from having inventory available, we are also continuing to make progress in lowering our cycle times. For homes delivered in the third quarter, our average cycle time was 114 days, down from 123 days in this year's second quarter. Cutting two weeks out of our production timeline is an important accomplishment, and it keeps us on track to reach our goal of 110 days by year end and be at 100 days in the first part of 2025. In truth, most of our divisions are already operating at or close to our 100-day ideal target. Our reported average is higher due to a handful of divisions, primarily those with large multi-family business, where cycle times remain elevated. In summary, operationally and financially, we accomplished a lot in the third quarter and are well positioned to have 2024 be a record year for PulteGroup. Now let me turn the call over to Bob for a review of our third quarter results.

Thanks, Ryan. And good morning. Driven by strong closing volumes, our third quarter home sale revenues increased 12% over last year to $4.3 billion. Our higher revenues in the period reflect a 12% increase in closings to 7,924 homes, while our average sales price in the quarter of $548,000 is effectively unchanged from the prior year and the second quarter of this year. Average sales prices by buyer group were also consistent with the prior year. The mix of our closings in the third quarter was 40% first-time, 39% move-up, and 21% active adult. In the third quarter of last year, the mix of closings was 38% first-time, 37% move-up, and 25% active adult. A slight decline in the percentage of closings from active adult buyers primarily reflects the timing of active adult community closeouts in 2023 and 2024 that we noted in our sign-up commentary during our second quarter earnings call. We expect a normalization of contribution from our active adult consumers when replacement active adult communities begin opening in 2025. Looking at our orders, net new orders in the third quarter totaled 7,031 homes, which is consistent with the 7,065 net new orders recorded in the third quarter of last year. It's worth noting that our average monthly absorption pace of 2.4 homes in the current quarter remains higher than our historic third quarter pre-COVID average, which was closer to 2.2 homes per month. Within the quarter, we did see a positive impact on monthly orders as interest rates declined from July through September. Compared with the prior year, Q3 orders decreased 3% for first-time buyers, increased 6% for move-up buyers, and decreased 5% for active adult buyers. Consistent with our guide, we operated out of an average of 957 communities during the quarter, which is an increase of just under 4% compared with the third quarter of last year. Based on activity during the quarter, quarter end backlog was 12,089 homes with a value of $7.7 billion, which compares with the backlog of 13,547 homes with a value of $8.1 billion at the end of the third quarter last year. During the quarter, we started approximately 7,800 homes and ended the quarter with a total of 17,096 homes under construction. These numbers are consistent with Q3 of last year. At the end of the quarter, we had approximately 7,400 spec homes in production, of which 1,357 homes were complete. This represents about 1.4 finished specs per community, which is consistent with the second quarter of this year. On a unit basis, 58% of our third quarter sales were spec sales, highlighting the importance of having inventory available to meet buyer demand. Buyer interest in spec production has been driven in part by our successful use of mortgage incentives, which are most effective when the consumer expects to close quickly. As always, we will continue to closely monitor consumer preferences for any changes if mortgage rates continue to decline. Based on the units we have under construction and their current stage of production, we currently expect to close between 7,900 and 8,300 homes in the fourth quarter. I would highlight that this keeps us on track to meet or slightly exceed our full year closing target of 31,000 homes. Given the affordability challenges facing today's homebuying consumers and evolving market dynamics in key cities in which we operate, our pricing strategy seeks to ensure we maintain a compelling offering to all consumers. With that said, our average sales price in the third quarter was $548,000, which is consistent with our guide for average pricing to be in the range of $540,000 to $550,000. Looking at the fourth quarter, we currently expect our average sales price to be in a higher range of $555,000 to $565,000. As we have discussed on prior calls, this is largely due to a higher percentage of our closings coming from our western markets where selling prices are above company average. Our third quarter gross margin came in at a strong 28.8%. As we highlighted during our most recent earnings call, our margins in this quarter reflect an increasing percentage of our closings coming from our western markets, which relative to other parts of our business, have slightly lower margins. Our third quarter margins were also impacted by higher incentive costs incurred during the period. Incentives in the third quarter were 7%, which is a sequential increase of 70 basis points from the second quarter of this year. Given competitive market dynamics, higher incentives were needed to help ensure we continue to sell homes and turn our assets. As Ryan talked about, higher demand improved as interest rates declined in the third quarter, but overall market dynamics remain competitive. As such, we expect incentives to remain elevated for at least the remainder of the year. Given the anticipated geographic and product mix of fourth quarter closings and the expected need to maintain higher incentives, we currently expect gross margin in the fourth quarter to be in the range of 27.5% to 27.8%. Based on our fourth quarter guide, our full year gross margin would amount to approximately 29%. Continuing down the income statement, our reported SG&A expense in the third quarter was $407 million, or 9.4% of home sale revenues. This compares with prior year's SG&A expense of $353 million, or 9.1% of home sale revenues. Our third quarter SG&A expense was in line with previous guidance and keeps us on track for SG&A expense of 9.2% to 9.5% of home sale revenues for the full year. I would note that our full year guide excludes the impact of the insurance adjustments recorded in the first and second quarters of this year. Our financial services operations reported another quarter of strong operating and financial results, as third quarter pre-tax income increased 90% over last year to $55 million. For the quarter, our financial services operations benefited from increased volume driven by the higher closing volumes in our home building business in combination with improved capture rates. In addition, we experienced increased profitability, particularly in our mortgage operations, due to improving market conditions driving higher market performance. In total for the quarter, we reported pre-tax income of $906 million, which represents an increase of 7% over the third quarter of last year. Our tax expense for the quarter was $208 million, or an effective tax rate of 23%. Our effective tax rate for the quarter includes a $14 million benefit associated with the purchase of renewable energy tax credits completed in the quarter. In the fourth quarter, we expect our tax rate to be in the range of 24% to 24.5%, excluding the impact of any potential incremental energy tax credit purchases. Looking at the bottom line, our reported net income was $698 billion, $3.35 per share, representing increases of 9% and 16%, respectively over the third quarter of last year. Earnings per share in the third quarter was calculated based on approximately 208 million diluted shares outstanding, which is down 5% from the prior year as the company continued to systematically execute share repurchase program. Consistent with our stated strategies, we continue to allocate incremental capital to the future growth of our home building platform. In the third quarter, we invested $1.4 billion in land acquisition and development, of which 56% was for the development of existing land assets. On a year-to-date basis, we have invested $3.7 billion in land acquisition and development, and now expect our full year spend to be in the range of $5 billion to $5.2 billion as our land teams continue to do an exceptional job identifying and structuring land investments that meet our strict underwriting guidelines. Inclusive of our land spend in the quarter, we ended the quarter with approximately 235,000 lots under control, of which 56% were held via option. We continue to make steady progress in increasing the percentage of our land that we control via option as we seek to drive greater balance sheet efficiency in support of higher returns in the future. Based on our land pipelines and the expected timing of community openings and closings, we currently expect to operate out of an average of 950 communities in the fourth quarter, which would represent an increase of 3% over the fourth quarter of last year. In addition to investing in the ongoing growth of our business, we continue to consistently return capital to shareholders. In the third quarter, we repurchased 2.5 billion common shares at a cost of $320 million, for an average price of $126.05 per share. Through the first nine months of the year, we have repurchased 7.6 million shares, or approximately 4% of our shares outstanding at the beginning of the year at a cost of $880 million or $115.74 per share. Following these repurchases, we ended the period with just over $1 billion remaining on our existing repurchase authorization. And finally, we ended the third quarter with a gross debt to capital ratio of 12.3%. Adjusting for the $1.5 billion cash on our balance sheet, our net debt to capital ratio was 1.4%. Now, let me turn the call back to Ryan for some final comments.

Thanks, Bob. I'm very proud of our organization as our local and national teams have done a great job navigating the ups and downs of 2024. Within such an environment, it's more important than ever that we continue to focus on the critical business strategies and tactics that have been instrumental to our success. First, we are continuing to invest in our business. We expect to invest just over $5 billion in land acquisition and development this year, underwriting to the same return hurdles and guidelines that we've had in place for more than a decade. Our disciplined process has allowed us to assemble a robust pipeline of what we believe are well-located and high-returning projects. In the process of underwriting new deals, we continue our migration toward controlling more land via option. This will be a multi-year effort, but we see the opportunity for increasing our option lot count as a way to enhance returns and help mitigate market risk. We have a long-term goal of getting to 70% option lots, which will be an evolutionary process as we work through our existing communities and add new option lot deals to the overall portfolio. Second, while we continue to invest in new land positions, we have to make sure we are efficiently and intelligently turning our existing land assets. Within our business model, we seek to achieve high returns by balancing the desire to maximize profitability of each home, while making sure we are turning our land assets. We often use the phrase, we can't be margin proud. The gross margin is an important driver of return on invested capital, and we don't want to give away lots that we've worked hard to secure. At the same time, we must be price competitive and offer a clear and compelling value to potential home buyers. I think our third quarter results show this balancing act as we continue to generate historically high gross margins, but we meaningfully increased incentives in response to the more competitive market conditions in which we are currently operating. And third, we must continue to allocate capital in alignment with our long-stated priorities. As just discussed, we continue to invest in the ongoing growth of our business through land acquisition and development. If we achieve our 2024 land investment target of $5 billion, our five-year land acquisition and development spend will total more than $20 billion. In a world where not in my backyard, it is alive and well, such investment represents countless hours of hard work by our land teams throughout the country. After investing capital to support the ongoing growth of our business, we continue to systematically return funds to shareholders, with 2024 being the fourth year in a row in which we will have returned over $1 billion back to shareholders through share repurchases and dividends. Over $20 billion invested in land, over $4 billion returned to shareholders and all while building a strong and highly supportive balance sheet with low leverage and high liquidity. I strongly believe this is a balance sheet that can support our growth plans, as well as continue to see us through the ups and downs of buyer demand that inevitably rolled through the housing industry. Let me close by thanking our entire organization for their hard work in delivering PulteGroup's outstanding operating and financial results. Hurricanes made this effort even tougher over the past few months, but I am incredibly proud, although not at all surprised, of how our team rallied to support fellow employees directly impacted by these storms. Your compassionate efforts are why PulteGroup remains a great place to work. Now I'll return the call back to Jim.

Good morning, guys. Thank you for taking my questions. The first one is maybe just help us on the sequential walk in gross margin from 28.8% in the third quarter to the range of 27.5% to 27.8% in the fourth quarter. Does that assume an incremental step up in incentives? And what is sort of the breakout between the headwind from incentives versus mix?

Hey, John. I think it's reflective of the current market that we're operating in. We highlighted in the commentary regarding Q3 that coming into the quarter, we had provided guidance indicating that incentives would be flat. However, they turned out to be slightly higher than we anticipated. We had a significant number of homes to sell in the third quarter, and the activity we observed came with that higher incentive load. We still have homes to sell in the fourth quarter, so this really reflects what we're seeing on the ground today. Additionally, there's a slight decrease in the active adult segment as a percentage of our overall mix. We noted in the second quarter that there were some closeouts, resulting in gaps in active adult. Consequently, you've seen the percentage of our total business in active adult decrease a couple of basis points, which obviously has the highest margin contribution. So it's the combination of all these factors.

Understood. Okay. And then, Ryan mentioned the hurricanes, obviously, there were two pretty devastating storms, Milton really hitting Florida pretty hard, and Helene going up into the Carolinas. What is the impact that you guys perhaps saw in the quarter, and what are you kind of contemplating as we move forward here as a potential impact on whether it's deliveries, orders, or whatever the case may be?

Yes, John, it's Ryan. First thoughts and prayers go out to the communities and the individual families who were impacted by the storms. They were certainly both very large and devastating in different ways. I may start first by highlighting how well our communities performed. Both our communities that are in active construction as well as homes that we've recently closed. The new construction standards and the quality that we built to, the way the drainage systems are designed, I think are a real testament to just how effective some of those standards are. So we had very little damage in our active communities, which is good news. The biggest impact is really two things, John. One, loss of time. So the three to four days to shut job sites down in advance of the storm, and then the three to four days kind of following the storms with cleanup. Those are days that are just hard to get back. Power is the second issue. So especially with Milton, the power outages were really widespread in Florida, especially in the Tampa and Southwest Florida areas. So power crews are focused on bringing the power grids back online. They're not as focused on setting new electrical meters for homes that will deliver in Q4. So we're still kind of working to quantify what those exact numbers are. We're confident in the guide that we've provided to you. And we'll know more, I think, in the coming weeks as the power companies recover. The other maybe kind of third-tier item would be some of the municipalities will be a little slower in responding to inspections, as they're dealing with kind of cleanup areas in the hard-hit communities.

Great. Thanks very much, guys.

Hey, guys. Good morning. Thanks for taking the questions. Hey, Ryan. Just following up on the margin guide, you mentioned the mix of the business, the active adult, etc. And you kind of touched on the storms. But I guess this is kind of like a two-part question specific to Florida. Your margins in Florida are well above company average. So I'm curious if that's impacting specifically the 4Q numbers, specifically for the guidance. But kind of more importantly, I guess, if you could just talk a little bit about what you are seeing in Florida outside of the storm impact? There's a lot of concern about rising resale inventory in the market, challenged affordability. And I'm just curious how you guys are thinking about that market relative to your very strong margins. Do you think there's an opportunity maybe to take advantage of that with taking share, maybe more incentivizing? Or do you feel like your land position in that market is so strong that you're, as you mentioned, not looking to give away those lots?

Yes, Alan. We remain very optimistic about Florida. We mentioned it briefly at the end of our second quarter, and on a positive note, we had a strong performance in the third quarter in Florida. Many of the inventory trends, both for resale and new inventory, have improved and decreased from their peaks. This is encouraging, especially in a quarter that typically sees slower activity as the summer months end in the northern states. As we enter the fourth quarter and approach the usual shoulder season in Florida, when the snowbirds return, I believe we are well positioned for a solid fourth quarter. We operate in nearly every major city in Florida. Although we don't do much business in Miami, our brands are strong there, and we have excellent communities. Therefore, I think Florida will continue to be advantageous for us.

Yes, Alan, it's interesting. You heard Ryan say how well our markets held up there. So we don't see a mix shift in the fourth quarter pending, of course, the municipality's ability to actually deliver permits, which you think that they will and we think we'll be able to work through. We had highlighted more of the geography and the margin is really that western markets have on a relative basis slightly lower margins for us, and that's going to be a higher percentage in the fourth quarter than it was in the third. And then it's the incentives on the spec or entry level probably that have more influence and as we highlighted in the prepared remarks, our expectation is that the incentive levels are going to stay high.

That's helpful, Bob. You mentioned higher incentives for entry-level homes. More broadly, you are one of the most diversified builders when it comes to price points. Could you provide more details about the demand you're seeing in the different segments, including entry-level, move-up, and active adult homes? I understand you report on orders, but that doesn't always give the complete picture considering community counts, openings, and closings.

Yes, Alan, I'll address that. I mentioned in my prepared remarks in October, and we've discussed it on previous calls, we conduct a survey with buyers visiting our website regarding their confidence in the current timing for purchases. We're currently experiencing a 12-month high in that sentiment, which I believe is a positive indicator for our business. Our website traffic, lead traffic, and foot traffic in our stores are also at 12-month highs. This demonstrates substantial positive activity at the top of our sales funnel, with September being the strongest month of the quarter. Looking closely at the individual brands, entry-level buyers continue to face challenges related to affordability. However, when rates decreased in September, we observed a notable increase in buying power that positively affected that buyer segment. This is an encouraging development. The move-up buyers remain particularly strong for us, representing 40% of our business, positioning us well to cater to this consumer group in the current environment. If we are fortunate enough to see some rate improvements in the coming months leading into the spring selling season, I believe this particular buyer segment will perform exceptionally well. As for the active adult segment, we have discussed in the past how they are most affected by market volatility and uncertainty. Presently, the most common concern we are hearing relates to the upcoming election. There is considerable uncertainty due to the ongoing discussions surrounding the election, and we are essentially waiting for the next few weeks to pass. We anticipate that this buyer group will re-engage with the market shortly after.

Appreciate it. Thanks a lot, guys.

Thank you for the information so far. I would like to focus on timing. You mentioned a few points about what might happen next year and suggested that due to the volatility in buyer demand related to interest rates, we will likely need to wait for the spring selling season to see how the market stabilizes. I agree with that assessment. The spring selling season will likely be a key focus for investors as well. I’m trying to understand how the timing of certain factors you discussed may evolve in the near future. Firstly, regarding the impact of the hurricane, you mentioned that delays would affect Q4 fully. Do you foresee any spillover into Q1, particularly concerning deliveries and revenues? You also talked about the timing of the active adult gap, which you believe will improve in 2025. Could you clarify when in 2025 you expect this to happen and how it might specifically affect revenues, given that these homes could take time to build? Those are the two main timing aspects I am interested in understanding better.

Yes, Stephen, it's Ryan. We've given a guide for Q4 that we're confident in. So we think we've factored in kind of our best estimate of what the hurricane-related delays and impacts will be. Things go quicker and better than expected. Potentially we get a few more closings in the fourth quarter, but we're confident in the guide that we've given. Then, as it relates to kind of 2025 and spillover impact from the hurricane, we haven't given a guide at this point. We'll do that at the end of next quarter. History is a guide. I think the system will come back online. And other than, again, power-related setting of transformers and energizing communities, those are the things that I think we sometimes see some delays around. But we'll tell you more about that as we get closer. As it relates to kind of active adult, we'll also give you our community count guide next year. Those communities have been in the pipeline for a long time. They're actively being developed right now. So we've got great visibility to when they're going to open. And most of those will start to open in the back half of 2025 and then start to show closings in 2026. But we haven't given a guide for 2025, other than, I would reiterate, we've talked about kind of our long-term growth guide of wanting to operate the business in a 5% to 10% growth window.

If we focus on the active adult segment, it appears that 2024 will feature a higher proportion of active adult offerings compared to what we anticipate for 2025. It seems there will be opportunities for a more robust mix in the future. When considering long-term business management, Ryan, what type of product mix do you envision for your company, particularly regarding active adult? Are you aligning it with the land you're purchasing now, or are you targeting a mix similar to 2024 or more toward 2025?

Yes, Stephen, we're still managing the company and the land mix. It's important for the business to be about 25%. Currently, the mix in 2024 is somewhat lower than usual. As new communities come online in 2025, as Bob mentioned in his prepared remarks, you'll see the mix return to our typical contribution levels, which is around 25% of the overall business.

Good morning. I was wondering if you could talk about stick and brick costs in the quarter and then assumptions for Q4. And it seems like lumber may have been kind of a good guy for part of this year on a year-over-year basis, but it's kind of ticked up recently. Just wondering if you could remind us your lag on lumber prices and any thoughts there?

Thanks for the question. To be honest, we've experienced minimal inflation on our vertical costs this year. We're running right at $80 a square foot, which is consistent with the last three quarters and actually consistent with the third quarter of last year. So when we look at it for the full year, we expect kind of a very low single-digit inflation on our vertical costs.

Anthony, as it relates to lumber, it varies by market. Most of our lumber we buy on a 13-week trailing random length average. It effectively helps lock in the margin at the time of contract with the customer so that we're not experiencing margin volatility during the build process.

Thank you for the update. I would like to follow up on the resale inventories. Ryan, you mentioned that inventories in Florida are improving or normalizing compared to three months ago. I'm curious if there are other areas, such as Texas or the western markets, where resale inventories are somewhat elevated, or if there are markets where inventories feel constrained.

I wouldn't point out any other markets regarding inventory challenges. You mentioned Texas, which has experienced some fluctuations in the past few months. This market faces more competition, with all major builders present. Austin stands out for its significant price increases, driven by high-paying jobs and relocations post-COVID, alongside short inventory levels. Consequently, we observed a slower pace of price appreciation. Some markets are still undergoing price normalization, but I believe they will continue to perform well due to good job opportunities, relatively affordable taxes, and desirable locations. Therefore, we remain optimistic about our Texas markets.

Yep. Thank you. Thanks, everyone. Good morning. I wanted to circle back a little bit to the cadence of incentives during the quarter. I think you broadly kind of described incentives as having remained elevated throughout the quarter, you expected to remain elevated into the fourth quarter. I was curious on where incentives began in Q3 and where it ended. And if there was any decline in incentives in September, as you said, you had particularly strong demand.

Yes, Mike, based on our guidance, we have noted that elevated incentives are continuing, and we did not see them decrease during the quarter. It's important to point out that our current rate is already below market. Therefore, changes in the 30-year rate don't impact us as significantly as our need to remain competitive and address consumer affordability. Even with a 25 basis point change in the 30-year rate, we are already positioned more than 100 basis points inside that with our incentive programs. What we're indicating is that consumers require assistance with affordability, and our incentives are designed to achieve that.

Right. I guess what I'm getting at is, typically when you do see an increase in demand, maybe it's not the initial reaction, but over, let's say, several months, I believe it is kind of normal to see incentives start to take down at that overall higher level of demand kind of works through. So I'm curious, that's really what I'm more curious about, maybe if it's not the first month of a reaction, given that you said it was really more concentrated in September in terms of the improvement in demand. If you know that were to have been more sustained over the following months, if you would normally see that, I think what I would characterize as a typical decline in incentives, at least for the move-up buyers perhaps, which aren't helped as much by that rate buy down. That's what I'm more curious about, I guess.

Yes, we'll need to wait and see. Rates have increased again. Ultimately, it will depend on whether the Fed continues to lower interest rates. Ryan mentioned in his comments that we believe the selling season will be a better indicator of overall demand. If the interest rate environment improves and demand remains strong, then we would potentially be able to reduce our incentives.

Right. Secondly, just on from a regional perspective, you kind of highlighted the inventory dynamics in Florida and Texas. I'm curious also for those markets, relative to the rest of your markets, if you've seen an increase in incentives in those markets, just given all the hype around resale inventory levels, if you've seen a significant or unusual increase in incentives in those markets, let's say, today versus six months ago.

Yes, Texas has become a more competitive market due to the number of competitors present. I wouldn’t say our actions are inappropriate or make us uncomfortable, but there are likely higher incentives in Texas compared to earlier this year. Bob mentioned that we will see what the fourth quarter brings; there might be a reduction in interest rates which could allow us to ease off on incentives slightly.

All right, thanks so much.

Thank you for taking my questions. I want to focus on margin dynamics. Bob, last quarter you mentioned a sequential decrease in margins for Q3 and Q4 compared to Q2, and you already considered the mix dynamics. Is the mix in Q4 turning out to be a bigger headwind than you anticipated, or should we just view the sequential change in gross margin for Q4 as primarily driven by the incentive load you highlighted?

Yes, on balance, it's not changing dramatically. We've got a little bit more Western market business, again, the strength there on a relative basis, it really relates to the incentives or, as we've highlighted a couple of times now, it's a challenging affordability equation and we're looking to meet it so that we turn our assets.

Yes, that makes sense. And then the follow-up is really drilling down on incentives. If you can provide a little more color, you talked about the 7% on total incentive load, and that's up 70 bps sequentially. But in the commentary, it seems like it's suggested it's really that the incremental change may have been predominantly on entry-level. Can you help us quantify what the incentives on entry-level are or were in Q3 and in your Q4 guide and maybe how that compares quarter-on-quarter?

That's probably a bit too specific. Affordability is a challenge for all of our consumers, especially at the entry level, where the impact is felt first and most. It will be a bit more substantial for them, but I wouldn't want to analyze it too narrowly.

Thanks. Hi, everyone. It's great to connect with you. I want to revisit the situation in Florida with a broader and long-term perspective. There's been some discussion about shifts in migration trends there, possibly due to changing weather patterns, insurance issues, or high prices. When considering capital investment in new projects starting in 2027 or later, do these factors influence your strategy, especially given the competitive nature of those markets like Texas? Do you expect a higher rate of return for investments in Florida? How do you view the allocation of capital in the longer term if you believe these dynamics in Florida may evolve, or are you planning to maintain your current stance?

Yes, Carl, thanks for the question. Florida has been very good to our business. We do have a lot of capital invested there today. So for what it's worth, we'd like to continue to see Florida perform well for the investments that we've already made and the capital that's already been committed. As it relates to future stuff, I think we'll take inputs as they come from the market. We're not going to blindly continue to go after things if we're seeing a change in market conditions. I think that's one of the disciplines that we have in our underwriting criteria. I still remain really bullish on Florida. In fact, if you look at the parts of Florida where we're investing, they're a little more inland. They're on higher ground. They're not places that are being impacted by the things that you see on TV. Some of the things that you see on TV are the things that are right on the beach. They're the coastal areas. There are homes that were built in the 70s and 80s, not up to current code. It's devastating. It's terrible. I don't think anybody would want it to happen. But my sense is, our business is not probably directly impacted by some of the things that you're seeing on TV. I'd highlight that some of the moves that you're seeing are kind of within Florida. So they're intra-Florida moves as opposed to out of Florida moves. Florida remains a place that's got great quality of life. Maybe it's not as favorable of a deal as it used to be, but still relatively affordable. There's good jobs there, there's no state income taxes. So there are some offsets to some of the things like rising insurance rates and the like.

Thanks, Ryan, I appreciate that. And then my second question is on off-balance sheet. 56% off-balance sheet now or option lots and the 70% is the goal. Is it still your intention to bridge that gap via effective land banking and as opposed to, say, farmer options? And what are you seeing right now in the land banking market in terms of pricing terms? Have the negotiations, the discussions you've had with the large bankers kind of gone as you expected or are you seeing challenges there that you didn't expect? Thanks, guys.

We are making significant progress on our land options, reaching 56% in the quarter. We anticipate this will be a journey that takes about three to three and a half years in total as we work to increase our land portfolio to 70%, but we are successfully meeting our milestones. I am very satisfied with the performance of our land teams. We expect that 50% of our land will involve farmer options or land seller options, while the other 20% we aim to option will come from bankers. Our land banking team has done an excellent job developing a portfolio of bankers we are collaborating with. They are reliable and consistent, contributing positively to our results. The interest rates they offer are linked to the overall interest rate environment, and we saw some improvement from actions taken in the third quarter. We will need to monitor developments in the fourth quarter based on what happens with interest rates, but we are pleased with how our land banking program is functioning.

Hi. Good morning. Thank you for taking my questions. First, a question on conversion rates. You guys talked about 5% to 10% growth annually. I think that included 2025. Just given where your backlog is trending, I think that would imply a pretty notable improvement in backlog conversion rate next year to grow closing to 5% or more. So any commentary on is that what you're expecting, improvement in conversion rates? And then if so, maybe talk about the drivers of that, whether that be the improved cycle time that you guys referenced earlier or any additional spec, any other drivers to call out?

Yes, Trevor. The backload conversion rate can be influenced by two main factors. First, cycle time, which can improve or decline. We mentioned in our prepared remarks that our cycle times are expected to decrease, which will certainly benefit us. The second factor is spec inventory; by definition, homes that are in production as spec are not part of the backlog. Many of these will sell and convert within the same quarter and thus won't be reflected in that metric. While I don't want to dictate how you should approach your models, considering the percentage of spec inventory we are starting and selling, along with the current interest rate environment, I believe a more effective metric would be the total homes in production. This would be a better indicator of our capacity to meet the closing volume expected for next year.

Okay, understood. And then I guess the second question then would be kind of following up on that. Finished inventory, 1.4 finished specs per community. That's a little bit above your longer-term target number of one. Can you talk about how you feel about your current completed specs level and how you're thinking about spec production then moving forward?

Yes, currently about 40% of our business is coming from first-time buyers, which is mostly speculative. Given the current interest rate environment, we aim for a higher percentage of speculative inventory in our work in progress. Historically, prior to COVID, we operated at similar levels. Recently, we've mentioned that speculative inventory constitutes between 35% to 45% of our total work in progress, and at the end of the last quarter, it was around 42%. We believe we are on track with this. Regarding finished inventory, in a build-to-order model, having one finished spec home per community was ideal. We are slightly above that at 1.4, but we feel comfortable with our inventory level. Over 50% of the homes we are currently selling are some form of speculative, which indicates production is flowing well through the pipeline. We feel confident about this aspect as well.

Awesome, thanks so much. Last quarter, I want to say you guys mentioned that land costs were likely to trend up about high single digits in 2024. Just looking to confirm kind of how that trended in the third quarter, what's embedded in the fourth quarter guidance? And then I know you're not necessarily talking 2025 now, but you do have some visibility here. So just curious as to whether that's a reasonable assumption in the next year.

Yes, we did see high single-digit lot cost increase in Q3. We do see that in Q4. We have not provided a guide for 2025, but we've said this before. Our lot costs haven't decreased in more than a decade. Land is more expensive. And as you cycle through older land, the stuff coming out is more expensive. We'll give some color as to what that means for 2025 when we give our 2025 guide.

That's fair. And then just sticking to kind of housekeeping questions and apologies if this was already covered, but just wanted to ask about options in lot premiums as a percent of ASP. I want to say last quarter it was around $104,000. Just curious what that was in Q3? And then perhaps what's embedded in guidance for the fourth quarter.

Yes, we were $100,000 in Q3. So relatively consistent, and that is embedded in our guide for Q4 as well. Worth it to highlight that, a lot of that option revenue and lot premium comes from our move-up and active adult buyers. So you're at, call it, 60% of our business is driving most of that. And to further the comment that Ryan made earlier, that's not where we're doing most of the speculative building.

Good morning, guys. Thanks for taking the questions. Back on that 5% to 10% growth that you kind of reiterated as a long-term target, I'm wondering if in fact that is still the plan for 2025 specifically and kind of to what extent you're willing to flex around that growth target maybe depending on where rates are or kind of general consumer demand is, and any thoughts around if there's a margin or incentive trade-off in your minds at which you might kind of dial back that volume growth? Thank you.

Yes, Matt, we haven't given a 2025 guide. We'll do that at the end of next quarter. The long-term guide that we gave was meant to be that. It was kind of a multi-year guide of how we're positioning the business and investing in the land. So 2025 specifically, we will tell you more next quarter.

Okay, fair enough. And then maybe one on the balance sheet, just the, I think the net debt capital of 1.4%. I'm curious if the kind of increase in land banking that you're targeting is actually playing into how you're managing the balance sheet here, if there is kind of a need to either hold on to more cash or kind of keep leverage low, if that is playing into it at all, or just more generally, what would be your thoughts around kind of increasing that leverage back to prior levels? Thank you.

Yes, Matt, we talked about this a little bit, I think on prior calls. And our view is, we've got a view on how we're investing in the business, how we're growing the business, and that's driving what our capital needs are. We then look to what operating cash flow is, how much of the business investment strategy we can finance with our own cash and with the operating cash flow. And then we go to kind of debt or other capital market mechanisms. I think the way to look at leverage is it's an outcome as opposed to it being a driver. Bob, anything else you’d add there?

No, other than to say in terms of land banking specifically, what it is really going to do is free up cash. As we increase the relative percentage of optionality, our balance sheet on a relative basis gets smaller. So it will give us more choices to Ryan's point about what to do with that cash.